Hamas has announced its readiness to enter immediate negotiations on a US-brokered 60-day ceasefire proposal, which is an important change after months of deadlock.
The group’s “positive response” to mediators signals a willingness to halt hostilities and discuss the release of hostages, though it has not confirmed acceptance of all terms.
Israeli officials have received Hamas’s response and are reviewing its contents, while US President Donald Trump has expressed optimism about a possible breakthrough next week.
However, the details of Hamas’s requested changes remain unclear, and both sides have a history of last-minute breakdowns in talks.
Hostage Exchange and Aid Access Remain Sticking Points
Central to the ceasefire proposal is a phased exchange: Hamas would release 10 living Israeli hostages and the bodies of 15 more, while Israel would free Palestinian prisoners over the 60-day truce.
The process is designed to build trust and create space for broader negotiations. Hamas is also demanding changes to the aid distribution system in Gaza, insisting that only the UN and its partners oversee humanitarian relief.
The group wants an end to the controversial US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s involvement, citing concerns over impartiality and safety.
Did you know?
The term "Gaza Strip" originated from the 1949 armistice agreement that ended the first Arab-Israeli War. It refers to the narrow strip of territory that remained under Egyptian military control at the time.
Guarantees and Withdrawal Conditions Complicate Progress
A major obstacle is the question of guarantees. Hamas seeks a US commitment that hostilities will not resume if talks falter, and it wants Israeli troops to withdraw to positions held before the last ceasefire collapsed in March.
Israel, meanwhile, insists that any truce must be temporary and contingent on the return of all hostages and the dismantling of Hamas’s military capabilities.
Far-right voices in Israel’s government oppose the deal, demanding tougher military action and restrictions on aid. These internal divisions add another layer of complexity to already fraught negotiations.
ALSO READ | Over 600 Palestinians killed at Gaza aid sites spark global outrage and calls for accountability.
Civilian Toll Increases Pressure for Resolution
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to worsen, with thousands killed and injured in ongoing Israeli strikes. Civilian casualties, including deaths at aid distribution points, have intensified calls from the international community and families of hostages for an urgent agreement.
Public rallies in Israel and appeals from bereaved families are amplifying the demand for a comprehensive deal. Both sides face mounting pressure to deliver relief and security to their respective populations.
History of Fragile Agreements Raises Doubts
Previous ceasefire attempts have collapsed over implementation disputes and mutual distrust. The last truce, which lasted six weeks, ended abruptly in March when Israel resumed its offensive, citing failures in hostage releases.
Both parties are wary of repeating past mistakes, making robust guarantees and clear mechanisms for compliance essential.
Mediators from the US, Egypt, and Qatar remain engaged, but the path to a lasting ceasefire is fraught with risk. The next round of talks will reveal whether the current momentum can overcome entrenched demands and deep-seated animosity.
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment