How Will Global Tech Platforms Adapt to Malaysia’s Regulatory Push?

Malaysia’s communications regulator, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), secured a temporary court order against Telegram on June 19, 2025, targeting two channels, Edisi Siasat and Edisi Khas, for allegedly spreading harmful content. This action follows the introduction of a January 2025 social media law requiring platforms with over 8 million users to obtain a license or face legal consequences.

Web reports indicate that this law aims to curb cybercrimes like online scams, which cost Malaysians RM2.23 billion in 2020 alone. Tech giants like Google, Meta, and Telegram must now navigate a licensing regime that demands proactive content moderation, potentially requiring significant operational changes to align with Malaysia’s legal framework.

Will Telegram’s Defiance Spark Wider Resistance?

Telegram’s failure to address repeated MCMC content reports led to the court order, marking Malaysia’s first civil action against a social media platform provider. The platform, an Application Service Provider (Class) licensee, faces pressure to comply or risk further legal escalation. Web analyses suggest Telegram’s decentralized structure and encryption focus make compliance challenging, as seen in similar disputes in India and Brazil.

Other tech firms, like Meta, have shown higher compliance rates—85% for Facebook and 88% for Instagram—indicating a willingness to adapt. Telegram’s response, expected in court, could set a precedent for whether platforms resist or conform to Malaysia’s regulatory demands.

ALSO READ | Why Is Iran Targeting WhatsApp in a Digital Crackdown?

Are Malaysia’s Cybercrime Laws Too Broad?

The MCMC cited content on the targeted Telegram channels as undermining public trust in national institutions and disrupting societal harmony, but specifics remain undisclosed. Malaysia’s Cyber Security Act 2024, effective August 26, 2024, and the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 empower regulators to tackle issues like cyberbullying, scams, and content related to race, religion, and royalty.

Critics, including ARTICLE 19, argue these laws grant excessive government power, potentially stifling free expression. Tech platforms must balance compliance with protecting user rights, a challenge compounded by vague definitions of harmful content that could lead to over-censorship or inconsistent enforcement.

Regulatory Compliance Reshapes Operations

To operate in Malaysia, tech platforms must now invest in localized content moderation teams, advanced AI monitoring, and legal expertise to meet the requirements of the Cyber Security Act, such as mandatory risk assessments and incident reporting. Web sources highlight that Malaysia’s digital economy, projected to contribute 25.5% to GDP by 2025, attracts tech giants like Microsoft and Google, who are investing billions in AI and cloud infrastructure.

Compliance costs could strain smaller platforms like Telegram, while larger firms leverage existing resources. The Asia Internet Coalition, representing Google and Meta, has urged clarity on regulations, signaling industry pushback against ambiguous enforcement.

Did you know?
In 2002, hackers defaced the Malaysian Parliament’s website, exposing early vulnerabilities in the nation’s digital infrastructure and prompting the government to strengthen cyber laws.

Global Scrutiny Intensifies

Malaysia’s regulatory push aligns with global trends, as seen in Australia’s 2024 guidelines holding company boards liable for cyber incident disclosures and India’s six-hour breach reporting mandate. The EU’s GDPR, with fines up to EUR20 million, sets a high compliance bar that influences Malaysia’s framework.

Tech platforms face a fragmented global regulatory landscape, requiring tailored strategies for each market. Malaysia’s actions could inspire its ASEAN neighbors, especially with the impending ASEAN Digital Economy Framework Agreement, which may harmonize regional standards but could also raise trade barriers if there are misalignments.

What Lies Ahead for Global Tech Platforms in Malaysia?

Malaysia’s aggressive regulatory stance, exemplified by the Telegram lawsuit and the Cyber Security Act 2024, forces global tech platforms to rethink their operations. Balancing compliance with user privacy, managing costs, and navigating vague laws presents major difficulties.

As Malaysia aims to secure its digital economy, tech giants must adapt or risk legal and market setbacks. Will these platforms find a sustainable path to meet Malaysia’s demands while maintaining global standards?