NATO Summit Sets Historic 5% Defense Spending Goal Amid Rising Threats

NATO’s decision to raise its defense spending target to 5% of GDP by 2035 marks the most ambitious financial commitment in the alliance’s history. The move, agreed upon at a high-stakes summit in The Hague, is a direct response to escalating security threats from Russia and sustained demands from the United States for greater burden-sharing.

While the new target is designed to strengthen collective defense, it also represents a pivotal test of unity and resolve for the 32-member alliance as they confront both external threats and internal divisions.

U.S. Pressure and Trump’s Influence Drive Historic Shift

The summit’s outcome reflects years of U.S. insistence, particularly under President Donald Trump, that European partners and Canada must shoulder more of NATO’s defense costs.

By committing to the 5% benchmark, NATO leaders delivered a major political victory for Trump, who has repeatedly questioned the U.S. commitment to Article 5’s mutual defense clause when allies fail to meet spending targets.

The summit was deliberately structured to minimize friction and ensure a clear, unified message, with a condensed final statement and a focus on spending rather than divisive policy debates.

Did you know?
The previous NATO defense spending target-2% of GDP, was set in 2014, but only a minority of members consistently met it. The new 5% goal is the largest collective military investment pledge since the Cold War.

Economic and Political Hurdles Threaten Implementation

Despite the historic pledge, the path to 5% spending is fraught with challenges. Several member states, including Spain and Belgium, have already declared the target “unreasonable” or unattainable within the proposed timeframe.

Many European economies face significant fiscal constraints, and the prospect of diverting hundreds of billions of dollars from social programs to defense is politically sensitive.

The agreement includes a 2029 review to assess progress and security risks, reflecting concerns about the feasibility and sustainability of such a dramatic increase.

ALSO READ | Can Trump’s Criticism of Israel and Iran Influence the Fragile Ceasefire’s Stability

Russia, Ukraine, and the Shifting Security Landscape

The new spending commitment comes as NATO grapples with a rapidly evolving security environment. Although Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine remains a central concern, the focus of the summit shifted somewhat because of recent U.S. military actions in the Middle East.

Alliance leaders underscored that the increased investment is essential to deter aggression and maintain readiness for both conventional and hybrid threats.

However, some members, such as Hungary, have voiced skepticism about the scale of the Russian threat and the alliance’s role in Ukraine.

Collective Defense Reaffirmed Amid Uncertainty

In their final statement, NATO leaders reiterated their “ironclad commitment” to Article 5, emphasizing that an attack on one member is an attack on all.

This reaffirmation was considered crucial, especially after Trump’s ambiguous remarks about the U.S. commitment to mutual defense.

Secretary General Mark Rutte and other leaders sought to project confidence and unity, even as debates continue over how to distribute the financial and operational burdens of the new spending goal.