Singapore’s Crypto Clampdown: Is Its Digital Asset Hub Dream at Risk?

Dateline: Singapore, June 6, 2025 - The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has introduced a stringent policy requiring cryptocurrency firms serving only foreign clients to obtain a license, a move it says it will "generally not issue." This near-ban, effective immediately with no grace period past June 30, 2025, has sparked concerns about Singapore’s position as a global hub for digital assets. Once celebrated for its progressive regulatory stance, Singapore has attracted major players like Coinbase and Upbit.

However, the new rules, requiring firms to hold $185,000 in base capital and comply with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule, could drive businesses to jurisdictions with more lenient regulations, such as Hong Kong or the UAE. Industry leaders warn that the move could erode Singapore’s competitive edge in the $2.7 trillion global crypto market, while others see it as a necessary step to curb financial crime.

Why the Crackdown Matters

Singapore’s crypto sector has thrived, with 26% of its population holding digital assets, one of the highest adoption rates globally. The MAS’s policy aims to protect investors and align with international efforts to combat money laundering and terrorism financing. However, the requirement for even small firms and individual consultants to secure licenses raises questions about feasibility.

For instance, startups with limited resources may struggle to meet the capital threshold or implement complex compliance measures. The policy also extends to freelancers providing advisory or technical services to foreign crypto firms, potentially disrupting Singapore’s vibrant gig economy in the sector.

ALSO READ | Switzerland's Crypto Tax Bill: Can It Keep Crypto Valley Thriving?

Global Context and Industry Response

The MAS’s move mirrors a broader global trend toward stricter crypto oversight. Hong Kong’s licensing regime, launched in 2023, has approved only 11 platforms, while Australia’s AUSTRAC has imposed hefty fines for non-compliance. Singapore’s decision to limit foreign-only services could push firms to jurisdictions like Dubai, where crypto regulations are more flexible, offering tax incentives and streamlined licensing.

Industry leaders have voiced concerns, with some executives noting that Singapore’s high operational expenses, coupled with this policy, could deter new entrants. Others argue that robust regulation enhances trust, attracting institutional investors wary of unregulated markets.

Singapore’s Balancing Act

The policy highlights a delicate balance between fostering innovation and ensuring financial stability. Singapore has long positioned itself as a fintech leader, with initiatives like Project Ubin advancing blockchain technology. Yet, the near-ban risks alienating startups that rely on serving international clients without a local presence.

Critics argue that the ban could stifle innovation, while supporters believe it protects Singapore’s financial system from risks posed by unregulated crypto flows. The MAS has emphasized that firms serving local clients can still operate under existing licenses, but the lack of clarity on foreign-only services has left many in limbo.

Did You Know?
Singapore was one of the first countries to launch a central bank digital currency pilot, Project Ubin, in 2016, laying the groundwork for blockchain innovation.

What’s Next for Singapore’s Crypto Scene?

Singapore is at a crucial juncture as firms reevaluate their operations. Will Singapore continue to maintain its position as a crypto hub, or will competitors such as Hong Kong and the UAE take advantage of this opportunity? The global crypto market is projected to grow to $5 trillion by 2030, and Singapore’s share could shrink if firms relocate.

The MAS has signaled openness to dialogue with the industry, but without clear pathways to licensing, many fear an exodus of talent and capital. The coming months will reveal whether Singapore can adapt its regulatory framework to retain its edge while prioritizing investor safety.