Trump says a friend gave $130M to cover military salaries amid shutdown

The Pentagon confirmed on Friday that it accepted a $130 million donation from an unnamed philanthropist to help pay military personnel during the ongoing government shutdown.

President Donald Trump described the donor as “a friend of mine,” praising him as a patriot who wanted to help cover troop salaries while federal funding remains frozen.

The gesture, however, has ignited a legal and ethical debate across Washington. Trump announced the gift Thursday during a White House event, saying the donor made the offer directly to him earlier in the week.

The president framed the contribution as a show of solidarity with service members facing delayed payments amid a congressional budget standoff.

Administration officials have not disclosed the benefactor’s name or whether the contribution was processed through the Treasury Department.

How did the Pentagon justify accepting private money?

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the money was accepted under the department’s “general gift acceptance authority,” a mechanism that allows the Department of Defense to accept donations for welfare programs and construction projects.

Parnell added that the $130 million was designated specifically for service members’ salaries and benefits. Still, this type of funding bypasses the regular appropriations process overseen by Congress.

According to fiscal experts, this approach diverges sharply from standard practices in federal finance. Usually, all funds designated for payroll or benefits must be appropriated by lawmakers.

Accepting an external contribution to cover compensation, even during a funding lapse, risks violating stringent accounting and procurement rules.

Did you know?
The Pentagon is the largest low-rise office building in the world, with approximately $6.5$ million square feet of total floor area, of which $3.7$ million square feet are used as offices.

What legal challenges does the donation raise?

Legal scholars and congressional aides quickly raised concerns that the Defense Department cannot legally spend the contribution. Under the Anti‑Deficiency Act, federal agencies are barred from obligating or spending money in excess of what Congress authorizes.

Without additional legislative approval, the Pentagon cannot draw from privately donated funds to meet payroll obligations.

Bill Hoagland, a former Senate budget director, said the current law is unequivocal. “The Anti‑Deficiency Act clearly states that private donations cannot plug federal pay gaps,” he told CNN.

While agencies can accept gifts, using them to pay salaries would contravene fiscal governance standards. Lawmakers have already requested clarification from the administration on how the funds will be managed and accounted for.

ALSO READ | China unveils $1.4 trillion high-tech plan boosting AI, 6G, and quantum sectors

Who might the anonymous donor be?

Speculation has run rampant about who provided the $130 million. Online discussions and political circles have mentioned several wealthy business figures known for ties to the Trump campaign.

Reporting by the New York Times identified investor Timothy Mellon as the likely donor, citing filings that show Mellon previously gave large sums to Trump’s fundraising committees.

Neither the White House nor the Pentagon would confirm the identity. Trump described the individual only as “a friend who loves the military and loves our country.”

The Treasury Department declined to clarify whether foreign ties were investigated before the donation was processed.

How does the donation compare to military payroll needs?

While significant, the amount covers only a fraction of the government’s military compensation obligations. The Pentagon spends about $7.5 billion every two weeks on salaries for 1.3 million active‑duty members. The $130 million donation, therefore, amounts to less than a single day’s payroll.

Budget experts have emphasized the broader fiscal gap. To maintain service payments through the shutdown, the administration has already redirected nearly $15 billion from research and equipment accounts to payroll stabilization.

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service has warned that, without congressional funding, upcoming pay periods will still face disruptions.

What happens next for troop pay and transparency?

Senate Democrats are calling for a full accounting of how the donation is being handled. Senator Dick Durbin and Senator Chris Coons have demanded written assurances that no funds will be spent before Congress authorizes such disbursements.

Meanwhile, Republicans have praised the donor’s patriotism, branding the contribution as an emergency act of civic generosity during a partisan impasse.

With the government shutdown entering its fourth week, Pentagon lawyers are racing to determine if spending restrictions can be temporarily eased.

Analysts argue that even if this contribution remains unused, it raises lasting questions about public accountability and the role of private wealth in government operations. Looking ahead, officials say the next military payday is scheduled for October 30.

Whether or not the anonymous gift can legally contribute, the controversy underscores the fragility of federal pay systems under political stalemates, confronting the nation with a constitutional dilemma invisible in dollar terms but profound in precedent.