Why Did the EU Reject Trump’s 100% Tariff Proposal on India and China?

The European Union has refused President Donald Trump’s call to impose 100 percent tariffs on India and China for importing Russian oil. This decision follows high-level meetings in Washington, where US officials pressed the EU to mirror its harsher trade stance against nations backing Russia economically.

EU diplomats described the tariff proposal as legally challenging and politically risky, expressing concern that aggressive trade penalties could undermine the bloc’s policies and ongoing negotiations. The commission avoided public comment, maintaining the union’s cautious approach.

What Did Trump Request at EU-US Talks?

At a closed-door conference in Washington, President Trump urged senior EU officials to slap hefty tariffs on goods from India and China, hoping tough import duties would limit funding to Russia’s war effort.

The US administration already imposed 50 percent tariffs on Indian exports and signaled willingness to raise duties even further in coordination with the EU.

US officials argued that high oil purchases by India and China are a major source of revenue for Russia. Trump contended that stronger tariffs would send an unmistakable signal, but European delegates found the move impractical for the current political environment.

Did you know?
The EU requires unanimous agreement among all 27 member states to impose new sanctions or trade penalties.

How Did EU Officials Justify Their Refusal?

EU sources said such tariffs would demand months of legal investigation to comply with trade regulations. They stressed that existing sanctions packages target entities actively purchasing Russian oil, allowing selective delisting if these organizations end their Russian dealings.

Officials warned that blanket tariffs risk retaliatory action and could undermine EU negotiations, especially with trade partners like India. The bloc advocated targeted sanctions as a flexible and legally robust alternative for exerting pressure without escalating broader trade tensions.

What Sanctions Is the EU Imposing Instead?

Since July, the EU has expanded sanctions against Russia, adding two Chinese banks and India’s Nayara Energy to its lists. The union has also targeted Russian oil shipments, some refineries, and financial institutions linked to sanctions evasion.

The EU prefers sanctions over tariffs to allow for gradual escalation and more precise enforcement. Sources confirmed plans for a 19th sanctions package, expected to target new entities in China, Russia, and Central Asia this week.

ALSO READ | Poland to Receive Largest Share of EU €150B Defense Loans

Could This Trigger Transatlantic Trade Tensions?

EU officials expressed concern that diverging approaches could spark trade friction with the US. While America backs aggressive tariffs, the EU’s measured policy reflects both legal and political constraints among its 27 members.

Recent talks reaffirmed the importance of transatlantic alignment, though major differences remain. The dispute could affect negotiations with India and hamper progress on EU trade deals, given reluctance to jeopardize diplomatic gains for short-term pressure.

How Are India and China Responding to the Dispute?

India faces 50 percent tariffs from the US but remains upbeat about future trade talks after a positive exchange between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi. China, meanwhile, negotiated an extended tariff cap and seeks to maintain stable commercial relations while facing expanded EU scrutiny of its refineries.

Both countries are positioning to dodge steep penalties, navigating complex international pressures while defending ongoing imports of Russian energy. Their responses illustrate the delicate balance of economic interests at play in global sanctions debates.

The coming days will test whether the EU’s targeted sanctions can curb support for Russia’s war machine or if mounting pressure from Washington will push Brussels toward more aggressive trade measures.